刚刚在bbc看到的，leave阵营change their mind？

QQ截图20160628104658.jpg663×587 71.3 KB

我简单胡乱翻译下

1：Immigration 移民问题
The campaign claim: Immigration levels could be controlled if the UK left the EU. This would relieve pressure on public services.
投票前声称：退出欧盟，我们可以控制移民，并且减轻移民对公共事业的压力。

The current claim: Immigration levels can’t be radically reduced by leaving the EU. Fears about immigration did not influence the way people voted.
退出后声称：退出不能减少移民，投leave的人没有被移民这个事情影响。

2：Contributions to the EU budget 交给EU会费问题

The campaign claim: We send £350m a week to Brussels, which could be spent on the NHS instead.
投票前：我们每周350M交个EU会员费，退出后可以花在我们的NHS上。

The current claim: The claim was a mistake, and we will not be able to spend that much extra on the NHS.
退出后：这是一个失误，我们不可能花这么多额外的钱在NHS上面。

3：The single market 单一市场

The campaign claim: The UK does not need preferential access to the single market.

投票前：英国没必要加入最惠国单一市场。

The current claim: The UK should get preferential access to the single market but will not have to accept freedom of movement to get it.

退出后：英国应该加入最惠国单一市场，但是可以在不接受人员自由流动的情况下进入。
日了狗了。

They are a mindless bunch of idiots in the first place. How can they change their minds if they don’t have any?

最后一句翻译改成：英国应该加入最惠国单一市场，但是可以不加入人员自由流动。

No Zuni no die

我刚刚听到外面几声震耳欲聋的咣咣声，还以为打雷呢，结果一看是晴天，真是奇了怪了……

这里当初讨论的时候多少人说了要么不要单一市场，要么肯定没法控制移民，不是还有人说这个要看谈判么？
这才几天就被打脸了。。。

Remain camp现在应该从project fear改名成project i-told-you-so

除非他们牛到把EU 搅黄了。。。

我真想不通投票之前居然有人相信这条？看看欧洲有哪个国家可以加入单一市场又不放开边境的？英国大部分人尤其60岁上下的人真的当自己是宇宙中心造物主宰，想要什么就得有什么。

他们还以为自己活在70年代呢

英国或许会一屁股坐地下耍赖，不给我就不走

这个已经被EU rule out了
不trigger article 50就不能谈，trigger了2年谈不成就滚
UK连耍赖的资本都没有

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36650014
这不是去搅和了，估计越搅和，EU越团结。这绝对是一个喜剧视频，太逗了。

这个二逼

英国可以说我就不TRIGGER你能把我怎么样

确实，无能为力，不过这种unsure，对市场也是一种打击和伤害。长痛不如短痛，来吧。总之横竖都是一刀。

从未见过世界上任何国家，闭关自守，最后发展成发达国家的，闭关自守，只会越来越差。

今儿也看到这新闻了，局势能有啥转机？？？？

Like many people, you still cannot understand the result and want to make some senses out of it.

The reason many ordinary people vote to leave is very simple “they don`t like immigrants, they want their country back, Britain for British”. All other reasons are invented to cover this reason.

The soon you accept the result, the quick you can move on.

These are just some possibilities that I personally think could be quite strong in the next few years regarding immigration:

1. there is a possibility that the number of immigrants from poorer European countries could INCREASE, whether temporarily, in the more economically active parts of the country, eg London, in the next two years, or whatever it takes before Britain formally departs from the EU and closes her borders.
   While they still could, immigrants who’re hoping to earn a better income in this country, might try to seize the last opportunity. And many of them are more likely to fall into the low skilled category. However instead of settling down they might just seek to get whatever they could while it’s still possible.

In the meantime, with the relocation of some global firms and the less than optimistic economic outlook, cities like London could lose some more talented European or non European immigrants.

In short, a swap in immigrants categories, but unnecessarily a reduction in number.
Should this be the case, it could be another pain to decide what to do with those who arrive in the next couple of years (and act on it) when Britain’s involvement in the free movement agreement finally runs out (if it does).

2. when Britain formally exits the EU the number of immigrants could reduce. However instead of being a result of Britain ‘taking back control’ it will more likely be caused by Britain’s reduced social and economic attractiveness.
   So, it would happen. But the fear is that it would happen for all the wrong reasons.

The above are just my speculations based on some very personal views.
I’m not intending to blame anyone or start yet another pointless debate.
To avoid further surprises we might benefit from equipping ourselves with caution.

说得对呀，站在第三方的角度，去算经济账是根本没法解释投票结果的