4444444444444444444444444444
你是商业拍摄，路人不是，硬要说的话，你摄影师是打着旅游签证工作。报警我觉得没必要，换个角度拍就是了，景多得是，你一闹不是更拍不成。
我只是想弄清楚，即使是商业拍摄，商业拍摄建筑物外景 也是无需申请permit而且是完全自由的吧。
我搜到的是这个Uk law 好像是允许呀
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/481194/c-notice-201401.pdf
page5
I want to take photos of sculptures and
buildings located in public spaces
You do not need permission to photograph buildings,
sculptures and similar works on public display in
public spaces. The photographs you take are afforded
full copyright protection. This means you, as the
photographer, are able to commercially use your work.
However, as outlined above, care should be taken when
taking photos of two-dimensional graphical works such
as posters or commissioned murals which are located
in public places. Making copies of those works
could harm the interests of creators, and could be an
infringement of copyright.
还搜到这个http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3136945/Absurd-new-EU-law-mean-ll-face-legal-action-taking-pictures-famous-landmarks-Photos-punished-breach-copyright.html
‘Absurd’ new EU law could mean you’ll face legal action for taking pictures of famous landmarks: Photos could be punished for breach of copyright
也仅仅是proposed
more london is a private estate, just like canary wharf, you won’t be able to film/photo without the right permission
是的啊，canary wharf那是是私人的，进入拍街道都需要permit的 这个我以前也听说了
可是不知道 伦敦塔桥附近的 泰晤士河河岸也算私人的？
我记得o2也不让拍照。
你确定不是因为在city hall门口的草地上拍得缘故吗？塔桥没有限制的，但是city hall（就是你照片里那个椭圆形建筑）门口的地就是楼上说的more london是私人的，如果你去那边上站着，又长枪短炮的拍。很有可能会被警卫制止得。认识的英国人也有过在那里拍照被制止得行为，因为不能拍市政厅建筑。而且一般三脚架特别专业才会被制止吧
不过具体楼主什么原因，真要看当时情况了。