造福大家, 最近的关于签证交费不成功而造成的rejection不算 invalid application, 的判例， 因而不算gap, 求威望,加银,

海外生活 移民签证
#1

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber)

Basnet (validity of application - respondent) [2012] UKUT 00113(IAC)

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Heard at George House, Edinburgh

Determination Promulgated

on 7 February 2012

Before

MR JUSTICE BLAKE, PRESIDENT

UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MACLEMAN

If the respondent asserts that an application was not accompanied by a fee, and so was not valid, the respondent has the onus of proof.

The respondent’s system of processing payments with postal applications risks falling into procedural unfairness, unless other measures are adopted.

When notices of appeal raise issues about payment of the fee and, consequently, the validity of the application and the appeal, Duty Judges of the First-tier Tribunal should issue directions to the respondent to provide information to determine whether an application was accompanied by the fee.

CASE 链接 http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/IAC/2012/00113_ukut_iac_2012_kb_nepal.html

#2

这个case怎么引用啊。。。。:cn17:

#3

很有用的例子 谢谢楼主提供

#4

因为 当事人的钱没扣，HO认为application是invalid, 但是上个月，法官推翻了这个结论，也就是说只要你表填对了，HO 钱没扣到手，不关你的事，只要你的表填对了，就是valid。

#5

:cn08: 求银子 威望！！

#6

小百姓同求 :cn01:

#7

我想知道怎么在文章里面引用。。。。。
直接看case内容，写不到文章里面白搭。。。。。{:5_129:}

#8

直接把case的名字日期写上去，然后把法管的判决写进去就可以了吧！:cn01: 我认为是这样的吧！:cn01:

#9

果然是造福大家

#10

我只能说，跪谢楼主！！！楼主好人有好报啊！！！:hug::hug::hug::hug::hug:

#11

之前也被这样子黑过一次，说是扣不出钱就把我的资料都退回来了，流泪啊

#12

Accordingly we conclude that the Judge erred at paragraph 32 in considering that non-payment, for whatever reason, even if the fault of the respondent, was fatal to the validity of the application and of the subsequent appeal. Validity of the application is determined not by whether the fee is actually received but by whether the application is accompanied by a valid authorisation to obtain the entire fee that is available in the relevant bank account.

这段话很给力。

#13

:cn01:

#14

{:5_143:}

#15

详细分析见下文
http://www.freemovement.org.uk/2012/04/30/fairness-to-the-rescue-yes-again/
another interesting post
http://www.immigrationboards.com/viewtopic.php?p=447228#447228

#16

这个案子对于2007 Fees Regulations后的gap很有帮助，但是07年前的需要further research。提醒大家判决不是随便用的，英国法律是严谨的。而且，关键是如果是你递交10年申请的话，你要来证明你当时提供了对的付款信息，因为以前的移民局的决定，追溯期已经过了，根据法律对证据的采纳原则，谁提出异议，谁提交证据。

#17

感谢！

#18

我不是搅局但是英国法律严谨我真的不觉得。10年guiandance对GAP模棱两可的解释，很多人靠运气过关，同样CASE不同CASEWORKER，不同结果。同样问题有人被拒有人过，完全没觉得严谨公平的体现。

#19

英国法律严谨与否我不清楚，但是你举的这例子跟法律无关吧

#20

yeah whatever