享受免费午餐(FSM)的比例和学习成绩有没有关系?最新研究结果说明只有24%的FSM白人学生满足五个GCSE的C以上标准!

享受免费午餐(FSM)的比例和学习成绩有没有关系?最新研究结果说明只有24%的FSM白人学生满足五个GCSE的C以上标准!

OVERVIEW: White working class pupils achieve the lowest grades at GCSE of any main ethnic group, with just a quarter of boys and a third of girls achieving 5 good GCSEs. Disadvantaged Chinese pupils perform above the national average for all pupils, while Bangladeshi, Indian, black African and Pakistani pupils from poorer homes all perform well above the national average for disadvantaged pupils. Improvement in urban schools, stronger family aspirations and cultural attitudes are suggested as some of the key reasons why different groups achieve differently.
[ul]

  • White British FSM (Free School Meals) boys achieve the lowest grades at GCSE of any main ethnic group, with just 24% achieving 5 A*-C grades at GCSE, inc. English and maths. They have now been either the lowest or second lowest performing ethnic group every year for a decade. White British FSM girls are also the lowest performing main female ethnic group, with 32% achieving the same measure.
  • In the past ten years, Bangladeshi, black African and Chinese FSM pupils have improved substantially more than the national average. These three groups have improved by more than 20 percentage points since 2006 on the benchmark five GCSE measure, while the national average has improved by about 13.5 percentage points.
  • While certain ethnic minority FSM pupils perform better on attainment than the national average at GCSE (such as Chinese, Bangladeshi and Indian), others still struggle (such as black Caribbean and Irish).
  • Travellers of Irish heritage and Gypsy/ Roma communities perform the lowest on all main attainment measures. These are small itinerant groups, facing particular educational challenges, requiring specific policy assistance.
  • 45% of white British pupils attend university after leaving school, the lowest rate of all ethnicities, excluding Gypsy/Roma. However, they have better rates of entering elite universities. Of those who enrol in university, 24% of white British students attend a Russell Group institution, more than most minority ethnic groups. Black African and Pakistani students show the largest differential between high university attendance and low enrolment in Russell Group universities.
    [/ul]

FSM学生,本土白人GCSE成绩最差,华人成绩最好,孟加拉国,巴基斯坦,印度和黑非洲人最近十年进步很大。在伦敦等大城市里面,移民多的学校成绩都比较好,在这些学校里面本土白人的学生成绩也比移民少的学校的本土白人成绩好。感觉差别不是学校问题,也不是FSM本土白人智力问题,问题应该是因为很多FSM本土白人学生根本不想学。

看看今天各大报纸的评论。

White working class boys perform worst at GCSEs, research shows http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/10/white-working-class-boys-perform-worst-at-gcses-research-shows/

Schools must focus on struggling white working-class pupils, says UK charity https://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/nov/10/schools-focus-struggling-white-working-class-pupils-uk

Majority of white working class boys fail to get good GCSEs: This is the tenth time they have been ranked the lowest or second lowest performing ethnic group in the past decade
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/gcses-white-working-class-boys-education-majority-sutton-trust-fail-exam-results-a7408606.html

White children 'falling behind other groups at GCSE https://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/apr/04/white-children-falling-behind-other-groups-at-gcse

Grammars help white working class boys into top universities: Pupils are three times more likely to go to a Russell Group institution
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3899796/Grammars-help-white-working-class-boys-universities-Pupils-three-times-likely-Russell-Group-institution.html#ixzz4Pc3O4nKx

Poor, white working class children ‘bottom of the class’ http://www.itv.com/news/2016-10-31/poor-white-working-class-children-bottom-of-the-class/

儿子班一个白人家长亲口说他家孩子junior 之前都从来不写作业的,我着实惊到了。

虽然不是100%,但是至少从我老公在三个中学执教的经验来说,FSM越多的学校,学生的行为还有成绩最差,打电话给家长,管都不管,我老公现在的中学,FSM比较低,虎妈特别多,一旦有问题立刻发email给高级管理层

如果FSM的是英语非母语(来自移民家庭)那情况就不一样,有一些很高FSM的学校成绩也非常好的。
http://bbs.powerapple.com/bbs/topics/2855125

北部的话,英语非母语的家庭还是比较少的,纽卡估计多点,他上班的地方都是北部有名的穷地方,第一个学校所在的地方去年一直上BBC电视的,就是钢铁厂关闭的地方,第二个学校所在地方上过benefit street,现在第三个好点,据他说周围都是豪宅,但是那里都是土生土长的白人,因为没有工业,啥都没有,所以估计没有移民会去那里

啊呀,我的帖子

我昨天特地在放学的时候去那个学校看了,小孩子都很有礼貌,老师也挺nice的,家长白人居多

父亲的出身很大程度上决定了孩子的未来

经常有人问我,早教从什么时候开始,我回答从找结婚的对象时候开始。 {:5_142:}

个人赶脚问题不止是学生不学,还有家长不管(小孩子毕竟还是需要家长督促的),老师混日子的也不再少数啊。。。。。。。

我还想呢,附近有一个学校貌似也不是啥富人区好像挺多打工阶级,可评级也是outstanding呢

Outstanding就一定好吗?这个就看怎么看了。

一个学校把大部分能考40分的学生推到60分,那确实是outstanding,但如果学校把主要重点放在这些学生上就有可能让少数几个有能力考80分的考了70。另外一个学校大部分孩子是可以考80分的孩子,如果这些孩子都考了80,那这个学校只能是good。 {:5_142:}

哇哦,这里面学问好大哦

大哥,我注意到孩子开学时,每个科目老师会给孩子设立一个target level,然后学期结束的时候,看孩子最后达到的level.
你的意思是不是,如果最后大部分孩子达到的level超过了当初的target level,这个学校就是outstanding学校了?而大部分孩子只是做到了target level,这就是good学校?
谢谢

每个人的target是为了每个人的personal development的,不是为了学校的inspection的。那么多学生,inspector不可能都看,再说如果是用于inspection那学校把每个人的target设的很低不就让学校很牛叉了。

那inspector是如何知道,学校是把大部分40分的学生推到了60分(然后把学校评为outstanding)、还是把大部分80分的学生维持80分呢(评定学校为good)?

两个孩子,一个孩子来自working class family,父母没有上过大学,家里翻遍也翻不出一本书来,另外一个孩子来自middle class family,父亲是doctor,孩子从小就在书堆里长大的,两个孩子上不同的学校,最后考试成绩一样,你说那个学校更好一些?

inspector用free school meal的比例,英语非母语的比例以及有education statement的比例做这个学校应该达到的target的参考指标,然后就可以对比这个参考的target。

inspection这种比较主观的评价我是不会完全相信的,inspection是事先通知的,如果校长重视各种paper work做的好,准备应付检查的面子工作做的好,那检查结果就会完全不一样的。

谢谢大哥解惑,明白了。

白人loser对社会的危害很大,看看Brexit和Trump {:5_129:}

好多白人就是等着吃福利的

顺便说下 我们学校上周刚来了ISI的inspection
忙到爆

美女还是去了私校:lol

你要是负责准备paper work你才知道多大的工作量。:Q