最新研究Grammar schools have no effect as genetics determines academic success

Grammar schools have virtually no effect as genetics determines academic success, study finds

Grammar schools have virtually no effect because genetics determine academic success, a King’s College London (KCL) study has found. Researchers examined the genetic differences between students who attend selective and non-selective schools, then analysed their GCSE results.

They found that children who attend grammar or private schools are more likely to do well in exams - but this is largely down to their genes, rather than their school environment. The study, published in the journal npj Science of Learning, suggests that the type of school a child goes to has little impact on their academic achievement by the age of 16.

Emily Smith-Woolley, the lead author of the paper, said: “Our study suggests that for educational achievement there appears to be little added benefit from attending selective schools. While schools are crucial for academic achievement, the type of school appears less so.” She added that teachers and schools should be more open to discussing the role of genetics in the classroom, and the effects it has on educational attainment. Professor Robert Plomin, another of the paper’s authors, said that genetics should be included in teacher training courses.

Researchers analysed data of over 4,000 students in England and Wales which included the students’ genotype, their family socio-economic status, academic ability and achievement at 11, school type and GCSE results.

Ms Smith-Woolley, a researcher at KCL’s Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, said that even if selective schools have little impact on a pupil’s GCSE results, they may benefit children in other ways in the long-term. “Although school type appears to have little impact on achievement at GCSE, there are many reasons why parents may opt to send their children to selective schools,” she said. “Future research is needed to identify if school type makes a difference in other outcomes, such as university and career success.”

Selective schools are often more likely to be better resourced, attract better teachers, and place a heavier emphasis on extra-curricular activities such as debating, drama and sports. Researchers measured each child’s “polygenic score”, which is calculated by analysing the genes linked to educational achievement. There are thousands of genetic variants that are linked to educational achievement that have a tiny effect individually, but when added together can have an impact on a student’s chances of doing well in exams, the study notes.

The findings show that on average students in non-selective schools had lower polygenic scores for academic achievement compared to those in selective schools. Overall, three times as many students in the top 10 per cent of polygenic scores went to a selective school, compared to the bottom 10 per cent.

Researchers examined GCSE results and found that students at selective schools scored around a grade higher across English, maths and science, than their peers in non-selective schools. But once factors that are involved in selection are taken into account – such as ability, previous academic achievement and socio-economic status - there was less than a 10th of a grade difference in results. In terms of polygenic scores, these only played a small part in the differences between exam grades.

Researchers said it is too early to tell how much genetic factors have an impact on the difference between exam results in selective and non-selective schools. Previous research has shown that genetic differences between students account for over 50 per cent of differences in exam results. There are a vast array of factors - all of which are genetically influenced – that have an impact on exam performance, such as intelligence, personality, motivation, health and wellbeing.

详见 Telegraph
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2018/03/23/grammar-schools-have-virtually-no-effect-genetics-determine/

上面报道的是King’s College的研究,Edinburgh大学也有过研究。

DNA tests can predict intelligence, scientists show for first time
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2018/03/12/dna-tests-can-predict-intelligence-scientists-show-first-time/

Hundreds of genes linked to intelligence in global study
https://www.ed.ac.uk/news/2018/hundreds-of-genes-linked-to-intelligence-in-global

:cn10:

老子英雄儿好汉
老子窝囊儿混蛋。

现在有科学依据了,支持。 {:5_142:}

以后好学校不是通过考试选学生而是通过验血选学生 {:5_142:}

成绩决定于DNA,那还折腾上好学校干嘛? {:5_134:}

不对吧,论坛女生版都说孩子智商决定于母亲,这说明和老子没关系啊。 {:5_139:}

据考证这个智商决定论是我最先提出的,参见我去年一个贴。
大哥你没记清楚,
女儿智商是父母一半一半,
儿子智商是母亲100%。
{:5_142:}
想不到与女儿相关的谚语,呵呵,以儿子代替。。。。

无非就是几个成了名的学者想夸大自己的影响力。什么都靠基因决定的话,那社会就又倒退到世袭制了。每个人一生下来就已经被制定好了一辈子要做什么,有什么样的人生。

龙生龙,凤生凤,老鼠的儿子会打洞。。。哈哈哈,爹搓搓一个,娘搓搓一窝。。。

My children have different mothers. 这么说我得worry孩子中肯定会有”搓”的了。 {:5_145:}

只要老婆都很聪明就不怕了啊

认识几个professor的孩子学习一般。聊天的时候她们很无奈。基因很多决定性格。学习好坏和学习方法和努力程度有关系。尤其是基础教育。和智商关系不大。

只和聪明的女人睡,这个难度太大了吧。 {:5_142:}

与其说是基因,更多因素应该是家长的socioeconomic status
参见布尔迪厄 Freire 康德 等等等一干大神

也对也不对,天生笨没啥悟性,进哪个学校都没用。再聪明进了管理混乱的学校,也会给耽误了。

睡没要求,生娃就有要求。为了对娃负责,其实生孩子的时候筛选一下基因还是很有必要的。

孩子教育从找对象开始。 {:5_137:}

下一步会不会是DNA selection制造超级聪明的天才儿童?好期待,就像SCIFi一样,哈哈

完全有可能 {:5_137:}

哈哈,哈哈哈!

成龙大哥,哈哈,有关系的。我个人的经验而言,男孩的智商高低完全来自于母亲,而女孩的则是取父母的平均值。