法国原来想走英国路线，现在改变策略了

Which is the best course of action?

Hugh Schofield

BBC News, Paris

Debate is raging in France about what is the better model for tackling Covid-19: the Chinese with their radical system of confinement for limiting the spread; or the UK with their “herd immunity” approach, according to which infection of a majority is inevitable – and even, if properly handled, to be welcomed.

Up until a couple of days ago, it seemed France leaned more to the “herd” philosophy. Like in Britain, the official view favoured a controlled propagation - buying time so that the wave of infections is drawn out over a long period, and hospitals are not overwhelmed.

But now suddenly, there is a shift in the other direction. First schools, then cafés, restaurants and allnon-essential shops are to be closed. It seems the government now thinks Chinese- and Italian-style draconianism is more appropriate - except when it comes to the municipal elections, which are going ahead as planned.

If it all feels a little improvised, that is perhaps excusable. We have after all never seen anything like this before.

我是期待BJ可以一条路走黑，绝大多数英国人也笑着面对死亡。

那我真的觉得英国牛逼了。

我觉得他不敢， 你不觉得他其实很胆小吗？

这不是期待么，毕竟二战中法国意大利西班牙人都是弱逼

IMG_20200315_121712.jpg700×929 64.2 KB

英国人反向思维，不关闭边境，但现在各个国家把到英国的航班取消了，相当于英国关闭边境了。

法国这是一看重症的一半都是中年人所以不敢硬抗了吧？英国这政策选择被学者质疑被民众骂，现在全国和Cummings掰手腕看谁赢。

死亡率感觉可以甩锅了

媒体原话：the UK is no longer testing every suspected case. So true positives will be far higher…meaning the rising number of deaths will look scary but is unlikely to reflect the true rate.

英国重症好少，都不到欧洲平均水平

甩不掉，和往年的死亡人数一比较，有多少死亡人数和这次病毒相关，一目了然。
这场全世界的战争，打赢了没好处，又不能找病毒谈投降条件分好处，打输了伤亡惨重。
下面就看这次第三次世界大战，哪个国家的损失小，无论是人员上，还是经济上，谁的损失小，恢复快，谁就能在未来世界经济舞台上占据优势。

我跟你想法差不多，这次就是第三次世界大战，经济，人员，精神上的损耗不比一次全球战争少。

新的世界局面即将来到。所有势力重新大洗牌。

bj的做法如果能从头到尾贯彻执行，换言之，死的人再多，英国韭菜都能接受。那我觉得英国能打开新天地。

民心还是站在bj这里，只是不知道能多久，希望一条路走到底，选择了就走下去。