其实以英国的工资，所谓的福利制度和严重的排外性，那些真正优秀的人会屑与来吗？
其实以英国的工资，所谓的福利制度和严重的排外性，那些真正优秀的人会屑与来吗？
PSW是不是要到明年四月才取消？不是今年就取消了吧？
是啊，10年永居好像没提
恩，在other route 那個section (第46頁）也沒有看到
自从去年工党下台之前制定的临时公民计划被取消后，我发现什么移民政策都是浮云了。 不到自己申请的那一天，移民政策都是个未知数。好好呆在英国或者赶快回国找好工作吧。 就这两种选择
请问lz和大家: 如果我已经有了TIER 1 GENERAL MIGRANT的签证，但是今年面临续签 (2年) 会受影响吗?
续签难吗?我现在工作还挺好的。
MAC 報告中的第253頁，建議PSW應該保留，而且2年時間維持不變
When we reviewed the PSWR
in MAC (2009e), we considered
the options of recommending
closure of the PSWR and
reducing the length of leave to
remain that was granted. We also
considered both the effects on
university funding and graduate
unemployment through labour
market displacement. We saw
no evidence of displacement and
found that the effect of PSWR
closure on current levels of
university funding was likely to
be comparatively small in relation
to overall university budgets,
but nevertheless significant, and
likely to affect some courses and
institutions more than others. We
recommended that the PSWR be
retained and its leave entitlement
of two years be maintained.
TIER 1 GENERAL 明年肯定有一個配額，但具體多少還沒有公佈，到時候提早留意一下，雖然位置少並不等於沒有位置的，所以要留意新聞噢
肯定是会变难的
好长的DOC
他是续签…
楼主关于PSW的引用有点问题呢
“…We recommended that the PSWR be
retained and its leave entitlement
of two years be maintained.”
上面这说的是去年09年MAC的建议(P253左上角第一段最后一句)，去年MAC确实是建议保留，但是今年他们的建议要看P253右下角的这段
“If the route is maintained, in the
context of the Government’s
objective to reduce net migration,
there may well be a case for:
shortening the duration of
stay allowed under this route;
restricting it to master’s degree
graduates only; restricting it to
those institutions and courses
which can be shown to generate
Limits on Migration
the greatest future economic
returns for their students; or some
combination of the above.“
根据这个提议推测，PSW有可能改为1年或者只有硕士才能申请，也可能会限制专业课程
是我大意了，這位朋友說的正確:handshake
这个是不针对永居和入籍的，只针对T1、T2这种签证的政策
10年底续签吗？那你很幸运！新的政策看来今年年底是出不来的，所以影响不到你。
看了一下 我的理解是 对 T1, T2 下手了， 感觉PSW 会变一年 要么就直接取消， T1 续签肯定很难 肯定要按新政策走 而且还受名额限制。t2 要砍掉很多名额。不过幸运的是没有提到 10年 估计那个是基于人权法的。一句话 想走的可以走了 能留下来的都是精英。
说了续签不限额啊…
“The arguments for and against
limiting extensions are finely
balanced. However, by definition,
successful extenders under Tiers
1 and 2 have UK labour market
experience in a skilled or wellpaid
job. Furthermore, limiting
extensions adds complexity to the
system. Finally, we are reluctant
to suggest retrospective changes
for migrants already in the UK
and, if extensions are limited to
new migrants only, this will reduce
the ability, in the short term, of
limits on Tiers 1 and 2 to reduce
net migration. This is because
changing the eligibility of new
migrants to extend or switch will
only have an impact on outflows
when their leave to remain expires
in 2 to 3 years’ time. We therefore
exclude extensions from the
required limits we set out
for 2011/12.” - Page 226
英国已经开始混乱了。大家收拾收拾，机会成熟后拔腿就跑吧。