大实话，小心会被说成是底层哦
北溪乌克兰没这个能力
1赞
他干得好会有人来摘果子 干的不好…
[quote=“kkkoala, post:22, topic:6342295, full:true”]
说就说吧，底层最爱说别人底层？他们生活太过灰暗，tory一下台就要去讨饭了～～
1赞
会抓紧时间卖掉公共资产的
苏纳克就一外强中干的货，啥都不会只会乱发钱乱加税卖公共资产
脸大啊 看脸一米九
2赞
隔壁马克龙比苏纳克智商在线～
Macron says there is “a distinction” between the blast in Przewodow - the cause of which remains unclear - and the barrage of Russian strikes on Ukraine on Tuesday.
Asked by reporters if this explosion, too, could be a Russian attack intended as a “provocation” to the West, Macron says he’s “not sure”.
俄罗斯顺水推舟，直接说乌克兰用这次反方向打波兰的行动证明了一件事，就是市区居民区的导弹袭击都是乌克兰自己的或者接受的外来导弹系统拦截失败或者自我引爆时造成的自摆乌龙
We also want to stress that no missile strikes were launched at any facilities in Kiev within high-precision firepower’s massive attack on the facilities located in Ukraine.
All the destructions in the residential quarters of the Ukrainian capital, demonstrated by the Kiev regime, are the direct consequence of the fall and self-destruction of the air defence missiles launched by Ukrainian forces from the foreign-manufactured air defence systems deployed within the city limits.
We want to emphasise that the high-precision attacks were launched only at the targets located in Ukraine and no closer than 35 kilometres (22 miles) from the Ukrainian–Polish border.
坐等NATO以Article 5的名义挺进乌克兰和俄罗斯从不同方向并肩作战
看耳朵的话 至少两米七
3赞
大耳贼（苏皇叔）
1赞
A German foreign ministry spokesperson has indicated to Reuters that today’s Nato meeting in Brussels has not been held under Nato article 4, the formal mechanism for a consultation under which a country can summon a meeting when it feels its territory is being violated or threatened.
Article 4打升级没过，所以想打5还要多等等
1赞
之前有人说有看到新闻说是英国干的，我寻思着我没看到这种新闻啊。。
Daily mail的新闻看看就好
都是头条体。
1赞
没可能了，NATO 主席出来说是乌克兰打得导弹了，还有波兰、美国、英国都说是乌克兰打的。这一波乌克兰搬石头砸自己脚上了，本来NATO可以借题发挥，毕竟春秋笔法也不是一次两次了。结果最后还是怂了，可能还是怕毛子真逼急了大伊万问候吧
1赞
波兰总统也怂了，大家散了吧，去抢鸡蛋吧。还有奶酪。明天新政一宣布估计又会大涨一波。
2赞
不要提鸡蛋。。。真的是无力吐槽了。。。
核蛋比鸡蛋多，
什么世道
无力吐槽
牛奶做的mozzarella 1.55
水牛奶做的mozzarella 1.70
什么世道
无力吐槽