这种塔应该没有手机基站辐射强，有些担心，房子还可以。
我查了一下，也许对大家以后有用：
police communications tower
有专家说没问题。
Is it safe for me and my family, which includes a three-year-old, to live 46 meters from a police communications tower?
A
The short answer to the question is yes, it is safe.
One way to judge safety is to compare the expected radiofrequency (RF) exposure levels in normally accessible locations around a site, such as a police communications tower, with science-based safety limits. The 60-plus year history of the study of potential biological effects associated with exposure to RF energy has led to a large body of scientific literature of peer-reviewed reports and studies. Independent reviews of this literature by expert panels throughout the world conclude that the weight of scientific evidence, including the results of epidemiological studies of individuals exposed to radiowaves and laboratory studies of animals exposed both short-term and throughout their entire lifetimes, has not demonstrated that exposure to RF energy at levels that comply with contemporary science-based safety guidelines, such as those adopted by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), can affect biological systems in a manner that might lead to, or augment, any health effect or interfere with the operation of medical devices such as hearing aids or implanted cardiac pacemakers.
Regarding sites typical of those in question, e.g., tower-mounted antennas used for personal wireless communications and emergency radio services, the maximal levels of RF energy in areas normally accessible to the public have been found to be far below contemporary safety standards and guidelines. There are several reasons why this is so: (1) the systems operate at low power levels (compared with systems used for commercial AM/FM radio and television broadcast) since they are designed to cover a limited area, (2) the RF energy is emitted from the antennas in a fairly narrow angular distribution in the vertical (so-called elevation) plane, i.e., comparatively little energy is directed downward in the vicinity of the antenna support structure, and (3) the height of the antennas above ground and the narrow elevation beam ensures that the energy is propagated above the roofs of nearby homes and offices. Moreover, because of the attenuation of building materials, the levels inside of nearby homes and offices will be lower than outside.
Measurements carried out over the years confirm that the levels of RF energy in normally accessible areas in the vicinity of installations such as tower-mounted antennas used for public-safety radio systems are typically less than 1% of the regulatory standards mandated by the FCC via the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Such regulatory standards are science-based and include large factors of safety to address various uncertainties.
A lot is known about the safety of electromagnetic energy at radiofrequencies. What is important is that thanks to the significant amount of research that has been reported in this field over the past six decades, national and international expert panels and health agencies have consistently concluded that exposure to RF energy at levels below FCC regulatory standard and WHO-endorsed safety guidelines is safe to humans, including children. It is important to point out that reliable scientific evidence indicates that biological effects associated with exposure to RF energy are “threshold effects.” This means that adverse effects are only associated with exposures above a specific intensity, well above current FCC regulatory standard and WHO-endorsed exposure guidelines. (This is a completely different phenomenon than that associated with exposure to ionizing radiation such as x rays, etc., where exposure duration is important because even low-level exposure produces effects that accumulate over time.) The threshold exposure levels at which potentially harmful effects of RF energy might occur have been independently established and confirmed many times over. These thresholds, with large built-in margins of safety, are the bases of contemporary safety guidelines and recommendations, such as those supported or developed independently by expert panels and committees worldwide.
In summary, based on a comparison of the levels of exposure to RF energy found in the vicinity of installations such as you describe with contemporary safety limits based on more than 60 years of research, there is no reason to believe that living near the communications tower would be unsafe for you and your family.
完全没问题
电磁辐射而已
不伤筋不动骨
和广播电视信号手机信号没有什么区别
有经验？
这段话很有意思：
It’s funny how only the one who profits from telecom industries will tell you that proximity to cell towers aren’t harmful. EVER SEEN A CELL TOWER in/near the houses of the so called ‘chief ‘ and ‘principal’ engineers, those govt. Officials that endorses cell towers? NO.
It’s the same thing like in 1900s. Cigarettes were not harmful because they made profits.
Next time someone says living near cell tower isn’t harmful, tell them to walk the talk and put a cell tower near their home and endorse them after that.
FUN FACT: The defense society of a close relative of mine in Jorhat has had a cell phone tower placed in the boundary of one of the willing resident’s house for an amount of 6k rupees per month. A HEALTHY FAMILY WITH NO CANCER BACKGROUND WHATSOEVER. Within 5 years, 2 of the family members died of cancer and now a third person is also suffering from terminal cancer. This is no joke and anyone wanting to verify can do so by just asking jorhat defense colony authorities.
电磁辐射而已
对健康没有影响
但是对房价有影响
5G塔对一部分人来说是散播covid的
这些人是完全不会考虑这个房子的
觉得碍眼的人也不会考虑的
你要是打算住几年就卖的话
那就好好权衡一下利弊吧
影响运势
哈哈！
嗯，我明天去看看，看来不会买了。
我可不是劝退的哈
如果价格合适的话 当然可以考虑
你参考一下附近的价格 比如几个街区以外的成交价
看看是不是差别很大
你买的价格可能稍低 到时候你卖的时候也会稍低 其实也抵消了
我的回答只是一个对健康没有什么影响
只是个无线电发射塔 传到你身上的辐射量可能还没有你家的wifi多
所以不需要马上下结论 去看看再说
1赞
多谢，有道理
这种塔和VODAPHONE 等的手机信号塔比较辐射强度一样吗？我家附近也有一个，我查了下说辐射不影响。
1900年时都说雪茄不影响健康
影响有，多少，那要再过几十年才会出来真相，。。。
频段不一样
性质差不多
完全没影响
1赞
它的功率要比家里的wifi大多, 而且是24小时发射和接受，
How much harmful is mobile tower?
The World Health Organisation’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) says radiation from cellphone handsets and towers is “possibly carcinogenic to humans” and may cause glioma, a type of brain cancer. Towers are more dangerous than handsets because they emit greater-intensity radiation 24X7
我来说说我自己的经验：
多年以前我蒙着被子打电话大概有1个半小时，过后就感觉很不舒服，记忆力明显下降，真的，大概过了十年，我感觉自己的记忆力恢复了。人体的恢复能力有时很慢。
这是我的真实体验。
1赞
以前我有个同事，只要她睡在密集的电线和线路边上，她头就会疼，但普通人就没有这症状。所以她睡觉很挑地方，不喜欢放电器，楼主不会和她一样吧？
1赞